coarse Wealth

I've been defending the Usa a lot lately, as well as investigating its cultural anthropology and philosophy, etc. One of the things I'm just starting to understand is that during the enlightenment, there were two competing ideologies that influenced the evolution of human consciousness and hence, human nature and civilization.

On one side, the realists insist that there is an objective reality that exists, thoroughly independent of the observer. One the other side, the post contemporary philosophy proposes that reality is subjective and that the observers perspective is all there is. The realists say that natural reality and all of its diverse Components have an essence, in and of themselves. Post modernists believe that we generate reality, and our plan is the fundamental principle of reality.

Federalist Papers

Now, I haven't read, The Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith, but I understand that it proposes that if every person does what is best for their own self, it will produce the most wealth. I have read the Federalist Papers and many other stories about the history and philosophy of the United States.

coarse Wealth

So, on the one hand we have this plan that is self centered, by definition, and another idea that is more submissive and adaptable. One ideology claims to generate reality, the other accepts reality. Both of these philosophies have influenced the evolution of western civilization.

I'm without fail a realists. However, I do believe that there is truth in both ideas. For example, the Computer I'm writing this story on both exists independent of my perception of it and is created by human creativity.

I believe that there is an significant human being, created by Almighty God, and that creative free time is an possible attribute of that human nature.

Now, the question becomes, are individual human rights more leading than our common wealth, or vice versa? I suggest that we can and should transform the self interest and competition possible in western philosophy and civilization, into self improvement and cooperation.

Yes, western civilization is the richest civilization in history. At least up until now. However, it has attained that prosperity at a very great cost, especially for citizen surface of western civilization. Any civilization that is based on the Darwinian ideology of survival of the fittest is barbaric. Yes, Darwin's ideas about natural history are fairly accurate. However, relative to the animal kingdom of life on earth, civilized human beings are a detach and definite kingdom of life on earth.

Cooperation, assistance and unity in diversity are distinctive traits possible in human nature. Yes, I know that animals cooperate, but not to the extent that humans do. The rule of law is the variation between wild animals and civilized human beings. That's the part that western civilization got right.

However, they didn't thoroughly eliminate the barbaric struggle for leadership and benefit over other people, thinking that competition is an possible attribute of human nature.

This story would be incomplete without referring to the influence of religion in human nature. I believe that Almighty God is the Source of most of the major religions on earth, and that the religions are the customary source of the rule of law. Our civil laws are secondary effects of the moral values and spiritual principles taught in the divine study revealed in the Religion of God.

This divine study teaches us, not so much that our natural instincts are evil, but that we should regulate the expression of our natural instincts with the rule of law, revealed by Almighty God. Different cultures have used Different stories to interpret this spirituality possible in human nature, but they all teach it in one way or another.

While I am saying that western civilization is not sustainable, I am not saying it is wrong or evil. Quite the contrary, the American revolution was essentially a civil rights movement, and the great republic of the west, its citizen and its government, have done more to strengthen the cause of human rights than any other nation or citizen in history.

At the time of the American revolution the philosophy and governance of the United States was a giant leap send in the strengthen of human affairs. Now, the imperfection possible in the principles are becoming increasingly unsustainable. American businessmen have run roughshod over the world cheaper and alienated most of the world citizen against the Usa.

I'm not saying the Usa is all wrong. I'm saying that allowing the most aggressive and selfish individuals to strengthen and lead our citizen is not fair and it is not sustainable. That idea is an old and obsolete ideology, good noteworthy to the Assyrian Empire or Babylon, than 21st century human civilization.

The American Indians had a very victorious and sustainable communist culture. Karl Marx and the Soviet Union gave communism a bad name, by the way. By communism, I do not mean the state owns the means of production. I believe God owns heaven and earth and every person and all things in them. individual human rights and our common wealth need to be properly balanced. Secret asset needs to be protected.

What I am writing about is transforming the culture that essentially glorifies bullying, self interest and competition, into a culture that has a cheap balance of individual human rights, our local community welfare and the universal common wealth of all citizen anywhere on earth.

This idea that I'm right and if you have a Different understanding of the truth than I do, then you are wrong, is a half truth. And all the conflict and contention is destroying our peace and prosperity. Sure, it has produced unprecedented wealth for a small minority of the people, at the cost of the majority of the people.

We, the citizen of earth, have a right and responsibility to heighten this situation. I do not claim to have all the answers. This is just an record in an ongoing conversation as far as I'm concerned. We, the citizen of earth, not any individual or group of human beings, need to accomplish this improvement of human nature, this more exquisite union.

coarse WealthEvidence that America is a republic not a democracy! Video Clips. Duration : 10.52 Mins.

This is only a 1 / 4 of the great documentary created by the John Birch Society. And 'John McManus and has much in America as a republic, democracy does not say. Make sure enough time to get all 4 parts of this document to be displayed on the website of John Birch Society. This is part 2 & 3 Part 1, points to our heritage and why the founders of what may take us do not have a democracy. Part 4 sets out clearly the differences between capitalism andSocialism / Communism. The United States is not a democracy, it is a Republic, I am sure that most have never learned this in school (if attending a private school or parochial )...... James Madison (Father of the Constitution) wrote in the Federalist Papers, "democracies are spectacles of turbulence and conflicts never, ever been found incompatible with personal security or property rights, and are generally more than one species in their lives when they were force in the death. "Alexander Hamilton said: "We're a republican government True freedom is never found in despotism or the extremes of democracy" .. Samuel Adams (signer of the Declaration of Independence, said: "Democracy never lasts long once the waste discharges, and murders itself." He knew the founders of the democracy of the ancient Greeks, some of the wildest excesses of government produced conceivable Democrats in Congress (at the time .. and the White House) do their best to convince Americanswe have a ...

Keywords: Overview, of, America, Constitution, Republic, Democracy, history, freedom, documentary, liberal, conservative, democrat, republican, founders, framers

!: Paralegal Bachelors Degree Answer !: Gun Safe Free Shipping Tips